OK then. Didn't pay attention to the "grenade" when you first mentioned it. I vote yay for "grenade"/"Pyro Cross" whichever attack you prefer. Both sound good to me. We need a better name for Pyro Cross because it sounds like a psy attack though.
Welcome to the new Sinister Design forums!
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
Show posts MenuQuote from: Bugfartboy on October 11, 2010, 09:39:24 PMUm. You mean, like the way Light Bomb is different from Dark Vortex?
WOW! Really? I havn't noticed But what do you think about the range 3 + shaped fire attack?
Quote from: Bugfartboy on October 11, 2010, 06:06:55 PMHow about Fire Burst? Sounds more damaging than Exhaust Fumes.
I was only joking on the name. I was thinking on something like Exaust Fumes.
Quote from: Duckling on October 11, 2010, 01:16:40 AMSorry, removed the abstract part. It was a bad thing to say. And yeah, we do want our ideas in, but I would accept it anyway even if my idea was flatly rejected. Just come up with a better one, I'm pretty sure you can. Don't ask me why I suddenly changed my tone, I was never asking for an argument in the first place. Maybe I got caught up halfway, but that wasn't what I intended.
My point; abstract isn't what ya got, or so I thought.
And doesn't anyone want their idea in? But, as the overwhelming majority has an unbased prejudice against it, the idea goes onto the cutting room floor. Except it was never in anything to cut it out of.
Quote from: Duckling on October 11, 2010, 12:38:14 AMI was saying, if you had bothered to define its stats in the beginning, you would have wasted less time in arguing about your idea. I'm pretty sure if you had followed the ideas on traps then you would have noticed that you lacked something. Actually, just notice every single idea that got yays and nays. They all had stats defined by the person before he/she modified them.
What are you going to do with a War Engine that's powerful? Run people over? I'm afraid that's too dificult to program. Since the ability to get places fast is an advantage, a designer would go with speed, not strength. Anyway, what I was saying was not that it needed forther definition, but that the explanation I gave on what a War Engine was like did not conflict with the current one for the sole reason that there is no formal definiton of a War Engine, just an idea, and the idea can take a couple of different forms. Details, details; if you want to ask more about the War Engine, first ask exactly how tall in centimeters a Stone Golem is. Then I'll gladly pay you back Tuesday... I mean provide information.
Quote from: im2smart4u on October 11, 2010, 12:16:30 AMThat is true. But of course the Ravinale guards don't know better since they were the next to be slaughtered. We want to make the Flame Golem unique because Flint was from the Mechanics. The Helenites are their own group. Even then, Helena was quite proud of Flint too, so it would make sense that some of its features would be based off Flint's.Quote from: Bugfartboy on October 10, 2010, 10:39:41 PMWhy would we want to separate the Flame Golem from Flint when we are basing the golem off of Flint?
That's why the Flame Golem should have a uniqueish attack to separate it from Flint. I vote fire fist.Quote from: Duskling on October 10, 2010, 11:06:15 PMThat was because they let Resistance soldiers into the camp. If they hired Helenites and the Resistance got into the camp, then they would regret not hiring the Mechanics.
the Ravinale guard member who hired the Mechanics said he regretted it and should have hired the Helenites.