Kitty over there is just trying to point out that we let the mechanical comforts in our lives "take control" of us in the sense that we rely on them so deeply. Hundreds of times a day we bet our very lives on the assumption that a machine will function properly. Of course, these machines never "decide" anything on their own. They are little more than complex physical configurations, and at their most complex they are little more than an assorments of "if/if not" reactionary devices. But then there are those out there that would say that the human mind isn't much more than that either. The question then, is where you draw the proverbial line.
I believe that in our modern world it is man using a tool and not a tool using the man. A computer doesn't want to manipulate data anymore than a hammer wants to hit a nail, the only difference is the complexity of the machine.
But I digress...
I believe that in our modern world it is man using a tool and not a tool using the man. A computer doesn't want to manipulate data anymore than a hammer wants to hit a nail, the only difference is the complexity of the machine.
But I digress...